Back to courses

ACCT 2610

Principles of Financial Accounting

ACCOUNTINGOLIN BUSINESS SCHOOL

This course introduces the fundamentals of financial accounting with an emphasis on recording common business transactions and mapping them into financial statements. It highlights how the balance sheet, income statement, and statement of cash flows communicate a firm’s financial performance and support informed decision making.

Instructors

Brendan Conroy, Bright Gershion Godigbe, Chad Ham, Debra Krolick, Douglas Laporte, Edwige Cheynel, Ibra Sall, Jared Jennings, John Barrios, Kimball Chapman, Mark Soczek, Michael McLaughlin, Raj Mashruwala, Richard Palmer, Ron Shalev, Weimin Wang, Xiumin Martin, Zawadi Lemayian

3.6
Quality
3.3
Difficulty
178
Reviews
Sign in to Review

Reviews

Quality: 2Difficulty: 4Jared Jennings

Changed class rubric, 3 tests instead of 2, but were replaced by graded cold call days in class over group cases. Was very condescending/rude if you didn't know the correct answer on those days. Fast-paced lectures. Confusing to know what he would ask on tests due to the change from 3 to 2. Tests are copies of previous years. Personable guy though.

7/1/2026

Quality: 1Difficulty: 5John Barrios

By far my least favorite class that I have taken in all of my academic career. His lectures were impossible to follow. Slides were so busy and explained very poor

5/9/2026

Quality: 5Difficulty: 2Weimin Wang

One of the most passionate people I've ever seen to be teaching accounting, which is saying something. Very friendly to students and easy to talk to. Also has very interactive lectures.

4/24/2026

Quality: 4Difficulty: 3Jared Jennings

Lectures were fast-paced but all slides are posted with lots of practice examples. Exams are nearly identical to past exams. 35% of grade attributed to group cases that take ~4 hours to really understand. No homework or quizzes, so it's up to you to prepare for exams. Mandatory attendance. Super funny guy. Textbook not required but helps.

4/16/2026

Quality: 4Difficulty: 4Weimin Wang

He is so excited about his topic, but unfortunately his topic is accounting. He brings great energy to a boring class. His lectures are very hard to follow.

4/15/2026

Quality: 1Difficulty: 4John Barrios

Not a fan, condescending

3/9/2026

Quality: 5Difficulty: 2Douglas Laporte

The teaching style was not so engaging (but it was accounting), but the instructor really cared about students.

2/7/2026

Quality: 5Difficulty: 2Douglas Laporte

His practice exams are like the bible for the course

1/22/2026

Quality: 5Difficulty: 2Douglas Laporte

Goat T3 Olin Professors OAT

1/22/2026

Quality: 5Difficulty: 2Douglas Laporte

explain concepts clearly, good slides.

1/12/2026

Quality: 4Difficulty: 2Douglas Laporte

Great professor overall, engaging lectures, covers alot of material. Exams are almost same format as past exams and he makes it clear what to study. 3 exams total and some hw assignments.

12/28/2025

Quality: 5Difficulty: 3Mark Soczek

Super nice guy, there's no homework so your grade mostly relies on exams, quizzes and group projects. Exams are kind of hard, but there's a nice curve.

12/25/2025

Quality: 2Difficulty: 4Richard Palmer

I took ACCT 4640 (Audit). He changed the course from prior years, assigning more detailed and time-consuming homework. The work wasn't hard, just a big time commitment. Very old-school: no laptops, nametags, and frequent cold-calling.

12/22/2025

Quality: 2Difficulty: 4Richard Palmer

get ready to teach yourself everything because he sure doesn't. class is just examples.

12/13/2025

Quality: 1Difficulty: 5Mark Soczek

Don't be fooled by the couple good ratings. Im guessing the only reason he's been given good ratings is because he seems like a chill guy. Almost entire grade is determined by exams, which are terribly hard for an intro class. If you have 40+ years of acct experience you may just be able to pass the class with a C. Good luck getting email response.

11/18/2025

Quality: 5Difficulty: 3Jared Jennings

Jared Jennings is my dawg. His practice exams are so similar to the actual exams that if you fail it's genuinely on you. These ratings are absolutely not fair, just do your best in lecture and pay attention and he'll be your best friend.

11/13/2025

Quality: 2Difficulty: 4Mark Soczek

He is a very nice person, but not a great professor. Very boring lectures, which covered material rather poorly. Tests were very hard (averaged around 20-50%) and cover things never done in class. Extra difficulty associated with this approach considering there is no homework, so if you don't study past exams, you would be completely lost.

11/7/2025

Quality: 2Difficulty: 4Edwige Cheynel

doesn't curve

7/7/2025

Quality: 2Difficulty: 4Edwige Cheynel

Didn't curve exams or grades, only 5 questions, practice exams weren't the same level of difficulty as real ones

7/7/2025

Quality: 5Difficulty: 3Richard Palmer

I took this virtually over the summer, and had a great time. Prof. Palmer was helpful and available for questions. The written questions were basically a P-set with a week to finish. The short answers were on a live, timed, in class session. Also not too bad, a lot easier than the mid-semester class.

5/4/2025